Screener
XME vs SETM
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.30% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than SETM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XME covers north america markets; SETM covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $617M |
| Since | 2006 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +106.2% | +139.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.7% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.35% | 44.37% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and SETM
Explore further