Screener
MFIG vs FBCG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- MFIG costs 0.07% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFIG covers north america markets; FBCG covers global.
- MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; FBCG uses active selection.
- FBCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | FBCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +32.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -43.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and FBCG
Explore further