Screener
MFIG vs NJUL
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs Innovator ETFs Trust
Key differences
- MFIG costs 0.29% less per year.
- NJUL is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFIG is classified as equity, while NJUL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; NJUL uses structured outcome.
- NJUL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | NJUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $213M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.85% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -14.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and NJUL
Explore further