Screener
MFIG vs NJAN
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January
Key differences
- MFIG costs 0.29% less per year.
- NJAN is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFIG is classified as equity, while NJAN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; NJAN uses structured outcome.
- NJAN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | NJAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $371M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.12% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -20.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and NJAN
Explore further