Screener
MFIG vs TCHP
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- MFIG costs 0.07% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TCHP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and TCHP
Explore further