Screener
MFSG vs FBCG
MFS Active Growth ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- MFSG costs 0.08% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than MFSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSG | FBCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $293M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.08% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +42.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +32.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.07% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -23.24% | -43.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSG and FBCG
Explore further