Screener
MFUL vs XNAV
Mindful Conservative ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 0.21% less per year.
- XNAV is significantly larger than MFUL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFUL is classified as mixed asset, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFUL | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.48% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $31M |
| Since | 2021 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.94% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -16.41% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFUL and XNAV
Explore further