Screener
MID vs ISCG
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.39% less per year.
- ISCG is significantly larger than MID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MID follows a active selection strategy; ISCG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ISCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MID | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $93M | $947M |
| Since | 2020 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +34.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.69% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -40.15% | -41.48% |
Similar to MID and ISCG
Explore further