Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MIDE vs EMCS

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF

Xtrackers

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$4M

EMCS

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF

Xtrackers

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$912M

Key differences

  • EMCS is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MIDE covers north america markets; EMCS covers emerging markets.
  • Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

MIDEEMCS
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$4M$912M
Since20212018
Dividend yield1.37%1.44%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+26.9%+50.1%
CAGR 3Y+16.3%+24.2%
CAGR 5Y+7.8%+7.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.731.02
Volatility 1Y15.95%21.77%
Max drawdown-24.59%-44.86%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MIDE and EMCS