Screener
MILN vs EMBD
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.11% less per year.
- MILN is classified as equity, while EMBD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MILN covers north america markets; EMBD covers emerging markets.
- MILN follows a index tracking strategy; EMBD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MILN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MILN | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $256M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MILN and EMBD
Explore further