Screener
MINT vs MINO
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MINT is significantly larger than MINO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINT follows a active selection strategy; MINO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MINT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINT | MINO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.5B | $623M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 4.60 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.27% | 2.67% |
| Max drawdown | -4.62% | -15.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINT and MINO
Explore further