Screener
MINV vs EPP
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- EPP costs 0.32% less per year.
- EPP is significantly larger than MINV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINV covers asia pacific markets; EPP covers global.
- MINV follows a active selection strategy; EPP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINV | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 3.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.1% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.9% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.43% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -23.49% | -39.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINV and EPP
Explore further