Screener
MINV vs GMF
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Key differences
- GMF costs 0.30% less per year.
- MINV is classified as equity, while GMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MINV covers asia pacific markets; GMF covers emerging markets.
- MINV follows a active selection strategy; GMF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINV | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $386M |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.1% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.9% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.43% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -23.49% | -40.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINV and GMF
Explore further