Screener
MKOR vs MCH
Matthews Korea Active ETF vs Matthews China Active ETF
Key differences
- MKOR is significantly larger than MCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MKOR covers asia pacific markets; MCH covers emerging markets.
- MKOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MKOR | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124M | $22M |
| Since | 2010 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +171.6% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.12% | 19.91% |
| Max drawdown | -22.09% | -40.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MKOR and MCH
Explore further