Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MKOR vs MEMX

Matthews Korea Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

MKOR

Matthews Korea Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$124M

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

Key differences

  • MKOR covers asia pacific markets; MEMX covers emerging markets.
  • MKOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MKORMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$124M$45M
Since20102023
Dividend yield1.64%1.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+171.6%+62.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+25.6%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.20
Volatility 1Y36.12%21.07%
Max drawdown-22.09%-19.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MKOR and MEMX