Screener
MMID vs IMCG
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IMCG costs 0.53% less per year.
- IMCG is significantly larger than MMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MMID follows a active selection strategy; IMCG uses index tracking.
- IMCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MMID | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.45% |
| Max drawdown | -7.93% | -35.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MMID and IMCG
Explore further