Screener
MMID vs IWP
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWP costs 0.36% less per year.
- IWP is significantly larger than MMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MMID follows a active selection strategy; IWP uses index tracking.
- IWP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MMID | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $19.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -7.93% | -38.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MMID and IWP
Explore further