Screener
MOO vs BBH
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
- BBH costs 0.21% less per year.
- MOO is significantly larger than BBH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BBH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOO | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $365M |
| Since | 2007 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.01 | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.89% | 18.82% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOO and BBH
Explore further