Skip to content
Screener

MOOD vs WZRD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.73%

Fund size

$143M

WZRD

Opportunistic Trader ETF

Annual cost

1.00%

Fund size

$3M

Key differences

Both MOOD and WZRD are alternative ETFs. MOOD charges 0.73% a year and WZRD 1.00%. The main difference: MOOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.

  • MOOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
  • MOOD costs 0.27% less per year.
  • MOOD is much larger than WZRD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

MOODWZRD
Annual cost (TER)0.73%1.00%
Fund size (AUM)$143M$3M
Since20222025
Dividend yield0.35%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategytactical allocationstructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+34.3%N/A
CAGR 3Y+20.6%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.43N/A
Volatility 1Y14.49%
Max drawdown-14.34%-79.00%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to MOOD and WZRD