Screener
MOTO vs FTXR
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF
Key differences
- FTXR costs 0.08% less per year.
- FTXR is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; FTXR uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | FTXR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $934M |
| Since | 2019 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +47.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 22.01% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -52.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and FTXR
Explore further