Screener
MPRO vs CGCB
Monarch ProCap ETF vs Capital Group Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGCB costs 0.80% less per year.
- CGCB is significantly larger than MPRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPRO is classified as mixed asset, while CGCB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MPRO follows a index tracking strategy; CGCB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPRO | CGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 4.23% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.7% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.68% | 3.99% |
| Max drawdown | -14.50% | -5.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPRO and CGCB
Explore further