Screener
MPRO vs CGSD
Monarch ProCap ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 0.82% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than MPRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPRO is classified as mixed asset, while CGSD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MPRO follows a index tracking strategy; CGSD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MPRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPRO | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.7% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.68% | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -14.50% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPRO and CGSD
Explore further