Screener
MPRO vs CGCP
Monarch ProCap ETF vs Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
Key differences
- CGCP costs 0.73% less per year.
- CGCP is significantly larger than MPRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPRO is classified as mixed asset, while CGCP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MPRO follows a index tracking strategy; CGCP uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MPRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPRO | CGCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.7% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.68% | 3.74% |
| Max drawdown | -14.50% | -15.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPRO and CGCP
Explore further