Screener
MSFU vs CHIQ
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares vs Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- CHIQ costs 0.33% less per year.
- MSFU is significantly larger than CHIQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MSFU covers north america markets; CHIQ covers emerging markets.
- MSFU follows a leveraged strategy; CHIQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CHIQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CHIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MSFU | CHIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $816M | $148M |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 11.88% | 1.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -26.0% | -16.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.7% | +2.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.41% | 22.72% |
| Max drawdown | -59.83% | -67.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MSFU and CHIQ
Explore further