Screener
MSMR vs XNAV
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- MSMR costs 0.21% less per year.
- MSMR is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MSMR is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MSMR | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.06% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $166M | $31M |
| Since | 2021 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.9% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -14.86% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MSMR and XNAV
Explore further