Screener
MTBA vs MBSF
Simplify MBS ETF vs Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
Key differences
- MTBA costs 0.34% less per year.
- MTBA is significantly larger than MBSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTBA is classified as alternative, while MBSF is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MTBA follows a multi strategy strategy; MBSF uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTBA | MBSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $201M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 5.53% | 4.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.11% | 3.00% |
| Max drawdown | -3.48% | -0.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTBA and MBSF
Explore further