Screener
MTRA vs GRPM
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
Key differences
- GRPM costs 0.19% less per year.
- GRPM is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; GRPM uses index tracking.
- GRPM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $482M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.98% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.36% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -43.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and GRPM
Explore further