Screener
MTRA vs RFG
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RFG costs 0.19% less per year.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; RFG uses index tracking.
- RFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $329M |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -42.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and RFG
Explore further