Screener
MTRA vs PFM
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- PFM is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; PFM uses index tracking.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $764M |
| Since | 2025 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.62% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and PFM
Explore further