Screener
PFM vs IMFL
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.18% less per year.
- PFM covers north america markets; IMFL covers global.
- PFM follows a index tracking strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFM | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $764M | $957M |
| Since | 2005 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 3.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.62% | 15.80% |
| Max drawdown | -32.21% | -33.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFM and IMFL
Explore further