Screener
MTRA vs PID
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
- PID is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; PID uses index tracking.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | PID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $929M |
| Since | 2025 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -46.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and PID
Explore further