Screener
PID vs IMFL
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.19% less per year.
- PID follows a index tracking strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PID | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $929M | $957M |
| Since | 2005 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | 3.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.71% | 15.80% |
| Max drawdown | -46.07% | -33.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PID and IMFL
Explore further