Screener
MUNI vs SUB
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.28% less per year.
- SUB is significantly larger than MUNI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MUNI follows a active selection strategy; SUB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUNI | SUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $11.1B |
| Since | 2009 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | 2.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | -0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.27% | 1.01% |
| Max drawdown | -11.16% | -9.46% |
Similar to MUNI and SUB
Explore further