Screener
MUSI vs MUST
American Century Multisector Income ETF vs Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- MUST costs 0.15% less per year.
- MUSI follows a active selection strategy; MUST uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MUSI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUSI | MUST | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $594M |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 5.74% | 3.30% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | +2.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | -0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.35% | 5.10% |
| Max drawdown | -13.91% | -13.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUSI and MUST
Explore further