Screener
MUST vs FUSI
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF vs American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
Key differences
- MUST is significantly larger than FUSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MUST is classified as fixed income, while FUSI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MUST follows a index tracking strategy; FUSI uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, FUSI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MUST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUST | FUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $594M | $23M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.30% | 5.44% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | 2.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.10% | 0.90% |
| Max drawdown | -13.83% | -0.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUST and FUSI
Explore further