Screener
MUST vs MUSI
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF vs American Century Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
- MUST costs 0.15% less per year.
- MUST follows a index tracking strategy; MUSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MUSI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUST | MUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $594M | $214M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.30% | 5.74% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.10% | 3.35% |
| Max drawdown | -13.83% | -13.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUST and MUSI
Explore further