Screener
NANR vs SIL
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs Global X Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.30% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than NANR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NANR is classified as alternative, while SIL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NANR covers north america markets; SIL covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, SIL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NANR | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $795M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2015 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.9% | +110.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +48.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 49.93% |
| Max drawdown | -49.15% | -63.04% |
Similar to NANR and SIL
Explore further