Screener
NANR vs XME
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
Key differences
- XME is significantly larger than NANR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NANR is classified as alternative, while XME is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NANR | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $795M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2015 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.9% | +106.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 34.35% |
| Max drawdown | -49.15% | -61.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NANR and XME
Explore further