Screener
XME vs GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.05% less per year.
- XME covers north america markets; GNR covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $4.9B |
| Since | 2006 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +106.2% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.7% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.5% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.35% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -48.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and GNR
Explore further