Screener
NATO vs CGCB
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Capital Group Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGCB costs 0.08% less per year.
- CGCB is significantly larger than NATO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO is classified as equity, while CGCB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; CGCB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | CGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 4.23% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 3.99% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -5.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and CGCB
Explore further