Screener
NATO vs CGCP
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
Key differences
- CGCP is significantly larger than NATO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO is classified as equity, while CGCP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; CGCP uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | CGCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 3.74% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -15.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and CGCP
Explore further