Screener
NBCM vs HARD
Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF vs Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
Key differences
- NBCM costs 0.13% less per year.
- NBCM is significantly larger than HARD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NBCM is classified as alternative, while HARD is commodity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, NBCM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NBCM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBCM | HARD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $424M | $118M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 6.44% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.50% | 26.36% |
| Max drawdown | -12.85% | -13.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NBCM and HARD
Explore further