Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

NERD vs QDTE

Roundhill Video Games ETF vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

NERD

Roundhill Video Games ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$16M

QDTE

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$828M

Key differences

  • NERD costs 0.46% less per year.
  • QDTE is significantly larger than NERD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • NERD is classified as equity, while QDTE is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • NERD follows a index tracking strategy; QDTE uses option income.
  • NERD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

NERDQDTE
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.96%
Fund size (AUM)$16M$828M
Since20192024
Dividend yield0.72%45.82%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingoption income
CAGR 1Y-14.2%+42.8%
CAGR 3Y+10.3%N/A
CAGR 5Y-7.0%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.41N/A
Volatility 1Y20.04%14.95%
Max drawdown-65.58%-22.86%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to NERD and QDTE