Screener
QDTE vs BETZ
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
Key differences
- BETZ costs 0.21% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than BETZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while BETZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; BETZ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | BETZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $51M |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 4.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | -7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 20.37% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -60.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDTE and BETZ
Explore further