Screener
NFEB vs CGCB
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Capital Group Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGCB costs 0.52% less per year.
- CGCB is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while CGCB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; CGCB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | CGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 3.99% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -5.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and CGCB
Explore further