Screener
NFEB vs CGUS
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.46% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while CGUS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 12.48% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and CGUS
Explore further