Screener
NFEB vs EPRF
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF
Key differences
- EPRF costs 0.32% less per year.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | EPRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $72M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 7.59% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -26.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and EPRF
Explore further