Screener
NFEB vs IJT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJT costs 0.61% less per year.
- IJT is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while IJT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; IJT uses index tracking.
- IJT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | IJT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 17.73% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -42.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and IJT
Explore further