Screener
NFEB vs IUSG
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
Key differences
- IUSG costs 0.75% less per year.
- IUSG is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while IUSG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; IUSG uses index tracking.
- IUSG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $30.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 15.83% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -32.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and IUSG
Explore further