Screener
NFEB vs RZG
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RZG costs 0.44% less per year.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while RZG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; RZG uses index tracking.
- RZG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $121M |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 18.69% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and RZG
Explore further